Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14583986›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Modification of the home environment for the reduction of injuries.

R A Lyons, L V Sander, A L Weightman, J Patterson, S A Lannon S Jones, B Rolfe, A Kemp, A Johansen

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

R A LyonsSwansea Clinical School, University of Wales Swansea, Grove Bldg, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK, SA2 8PP.
L V Sander
A L Weightman
J Patterson
S A Lannon S Jones
B Rolfe
A Kemp
A Johansen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInjury in the home is extremely common, accounting for around a third of all injuries. The majority of injuries of children under five and people aged 75 and over occur at home. Multi-factorial injury prevention interventions have been shown to reduce injuries in the home. However, few studies have focussed specifically on the impact of physical adaptations to the home environment and the effectiveness of such intervention needs to be ascertained.

objectivesTo review the evidence for the effect on injuries of modification of the home environment with a primary focus on interventions to reduce physical hazards. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following databases: APId, ASSIA, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, Cochrane Library databases, Dissertation Abstracts, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, ICONDA, ISI Science (and Social Science) Citation Index, MEDLINE, National Research Register, PREMEDLINE, SIGLE and Urbadisk. Conference proceedings and reference lists were scanned. Experts in the field and trialists were contacted. Searches were not restricted to English language. Handsearching of relevant journals was not conducted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All abstracts were screened by two reviewers for relevance, outcome and design. Two reviewers independently evaluated methodological quality and extracted data from each eligible study. MAIN

resultsWe found 28 published trials and one unpublished study. Trials were not sufficiently similar to allow for the combination of data by statistical analyses, so this review takes a narrative form. Studies were divided into three groups based on the primary population sample: children, older people and the general population. None of the 11 childhood studies demonstrated a reduction in injuries that might have been due to environmental adaptation in the home. One study reported a reduction in injuries and in hazards but the two could not be linked. The majority of studies used hazard reduction as the outcome. Of the 15 studies in older people, none demonstrated a reduction in injuries due to hazard reduction, although two demonstrated a reduction in falls that could be due to hazard reduction. In the mixed age group there were two trials; neither demonstrated an effect on injuries. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to determine the effects of interventions to modify environmental home hazards. Further interventions to reduce hazards in the home should be evaluated by adequately designed randomised controlled trials measuring injury outcomes. Recruitment of large study samples to measure effect may be a major consideration for future trials.

Indexed as

Environment DesignHousingAccidents, HomeAgedChildControlled Clinical Trials as TopicHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.