Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14583984›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Hospital at home for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

F S F Ram, J A Wedzicha, J Wright, M Greenstone

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Home-based telehealth hospitalization for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from "the virtual hospital" trial.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2015
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F S F RamNational Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 27, Sussex Place, Regent's Park, London, UK, NW1 4RG.
J A Wedzicha
J Wright
M Greenstone

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital at home schemes are a recently adopted method of service delivery for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease aimed at reducing demand for acute hospital in-patient beds and promoting a patient centered approach through admission avoidance. However, evidence in support of such a service is contradictory.

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of "hospital at home" compared to hospital inpatient care in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; electronically available databases e.g. MEDLINE (1966-current), EMBASE (1980-current), PubMed, ClincalTrials, Science Citation Index and on-line individual respiratory journals; bibliographies of included trials were all searched and contact with authors was made to obtain studies. The most recent searches were carried out in August 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials were considered where patients presented to the emergency department with an exacerbation of their chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Studies must not have recruited patients that are usually deemed obligatory admissions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected articles for inclusion, evaluated methodological quality of the studies and abstracted data. MAIN

resultsSeven studies with 754 patients were included in the review. Studies provided data on hospital readmission and mortality both of which were not significantly different when the two study groups were compared (RR 0.89; 95%CI 0.72 to 1.12 & RR 0.61; 95%CI 0.36 to 1.05, respectively). Both the patients and the carers preferred hospital at home schemes to inpatient care (RR 1.53; 95%CI 1.23 to 1.90). Other reported outcomes included few studies. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThis review has shown that one in four carefully selected patients presenting to hospital emergency departments with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be safely and successfully treated at home with support from respiratory nurses. This review found no evidence of significant differences between "hospital at home" patients and hospital inpatients for readmission rates and mortality at two to three months after the initial exacerbation. Both the patients and carers preferred "hospital at home" schemes to inpatient care.

Indexed as

Home Care Services, Hospital-BasedAcute DiseaseHospitalizationHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.