Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14583963›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia.

L Clare, R T Woods, E D Moniz Cook, M Orrell, A Spector

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00646269 (Efficacy Assessment of Three Non Pharmacological Therapies in Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 157 papers, 29 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 29 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00646269 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2008, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy Assessment of Three Non Pharmacological Therapies in Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2008 to 2012Enrolled640ConditionsAlzheimer's DiseaseArmsStandard intervention protocol, Standard intervention protocol + Cognitive training therapy, Standard intervention protocol + Reminiscence therapy, Standard intervention protocol + "Made-to-measure" program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 29 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Computerized programs for cancer survivors with cognitive problems: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019
    Pooled it
  18. Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  19. Reducing Burden for Caregivers of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2018
    Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L ClareSub-department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK, WC1E 6BT. l.clare@ucl.ac.uk
R T Woods
E D Moniz Cook
M Orrell
A Spector

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMemory problems are a defining feature of the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation are specific approaches designed to address everyday memory difficulties.

objectivesThe main aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving memory functioning for people in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. The two types of intervention were considered separately. SEARCH STRATEGY: The CDCIG Specialized Register, which contains records from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and many other databases, was searched on 9 April 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing cognitive rehabilitation or cognitive training interventions with comparison conditions, and reporting outcomes for the person with dementia and/or the family caregiver, were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six studies reporting cognitive training interventions were included. Statistical analyses were conducted to provide an indication of intervention effect sizes. Data from ordinal scales was treated as continuous, and a fixed effects model was applied in calculating weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. No studies were found that reported a fully individualised cognitive rehabilitation approach. MAIN

resultsNone of the six studies reporting cognitive training interventions demonstrated any statistically significant effects in any domain, although there were indications of some modest, non-significant effects in various domains of cognitive functioning. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe present findings do not provide strong support for the use of cognitive training interventions for people with early-stage AD or vascular dementia, although these findings must be viewed with caution due to the limited number of RCTs available and to the methodological limitations identified, and further well-designed trials would help to provide more definitive evidence. Due to a complete absence of RCTs evaluating an individualised cognitive rehabilitation approach, It is not possible at present to draw conclusions about the efficacy of individualised cognitive rehabilitation interventions for people with early-stage dementia, and further research is required in this area.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive Behavioral TherapyDementia, VascularHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.