Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14583962›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough.

V Pillay, G Swingler

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pertussis: not only a disease of childhood.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2008
    Article
  8. Whooping cough in general practice.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnosis and management of pertussis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V PillayDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, School of Child and Adolescent Health, ICH Building, 5th Floor, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa, 7700.
G Swingler
Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhooping cough is an important cause of childhood morbidity and mortality. There are 20 to 40 million cases of whooping cough annually world-wide, 90% of which occur in developing countries, resulting in an estimated 200 to 300 000 fatalities each year. Much of the morbidity is due to the effects of the paroxysmal cough. Corticosteroids, salbutamol (beta 2 - adrenergic stimulant), and pertussis-specific immunoglobulin have been proposed as standard treatment for the cough. Antihistamines have also been administered. No systematic review of the effectiveness of any of these interventions or others has been performed.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of interventions used to reduce the severity of the coughing paroxysms in whooping cough in children and adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (issue 2, 2003); MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2003); EMBASE (1990 to June 2003) and LILACS (1982 to November 2001). We also scanned reference lists of identified trials and contacted authors of identified trials and relevant pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of any intervention aimed at suppressing the cough in whooping cough; excluding antibiotics and vaccines. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Our primary outcome was frequency of paroxysms of coughing. Secondary outcomes were frequency of vomiting, frequency of whoop, frequency of cyanosis, development of serious complications, mortality from any cause, side effects due to medication, admission to hospital and duration of hospital stay. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. MAIN

resultsNine studies satisfied the inclusion criteria but four had insufficient data for meta - analysis of pre-specified outcomes. Studies were small and poorly reported. The largest study had a sample size of 49 and the smallest study 18. All studies were performed in industrialised settings. Eligible studies assessed diphenhyramine, pertussis immunoglobulin, dexamethasone and salbutamol. No statistically significant benefit was found for any of the interventions. Diphenhydramine did not change coughing spells (mean increase of coughing spells per 24 hours 1.9 with 95%CI - 4.7 to 8.5) and pertussis immunoglobulin no change in hospital stay (0.7 days 95% CI -3.8 to 2.4), and a mean reduction of 3.1 whoops per 24 hours [95% CI -6.2; 0.02]. Dexamethasone did not show a clear decrease in hospital stay (-3.5 days 95% CI - 15.3 to 8.4) and salbutamol showed no change in coughing paroxysms per 24 hours [-0.22 95% CI - 4.13 to 3.69]. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsInsufficient evidence exists to draw conclusions about the effects of any intervention for the cough in whooping cough.

Indexed as

AdultAlbuterolChildDexamethasoneDiphenhydramineHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansImmunoglobulinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWhooping CoughAlbuterolDexamethasoneDiphenhydramineHistamine H1 AntagonistsImmunoglobulins

Identifiers

PMID14583962
OpenAlexW1750544629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.