Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14583943›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.

Y Agra, M Pelayo, M Sacristan, A Sacristán, C Serra, X Bonfill

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognostic Significance of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index in Metastatic Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 96 Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. State-of-the-Art Molecular Oncology of Lung Cancer in Taiwan.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A rare case of bipartite combined tumour of the oesophagus.World journal of surgical oncology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What's New in SCLC? A Review.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of chemotherapy on survival of elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer: analysis of the SEER-medicare database.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2013
    Article
  17. A systematic analysis of efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in sensitive and refractory small-cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Small cell lung cancer].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y AgraCentro de Salud Pacífico Atención Primaria Area 1 Madrid, IMSALUD, Plaza de los Reyes Magos s/n, Madrid, 28007, SPAIN. yoagra@tiscali.es
M Pelayo
M Sacristan
A Sacristán
C Serra
X Bonfill
Hospital de Sant Pau · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 25 years even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients, if their survival prognosis is limited, should be adequate palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy in extensive SCLC compared with best supportive care (BSC) or placebo treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline (1966-Jan 2003), Embase (1974-Jan 2003), Cancerlit (1993-Jan 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 4, 2002) were searched. In addition experts in the field were contacted to identify further studies not found by electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with a placebo group or best supportive care in patients with extensive stage SCLC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently by two reviewers and disagreements were resolved by a third author. Additional information on the included studies was obtained from the author of the original studies. MAIN

resultsOnly two studies (the first published in 1977 and the second in 1982) met the inclusion criteria of the review. A total of 65 patients with extensive disease (33 in the first study and 32 in the second) were randomised to received either placebo treatment or ifosfamide. In the second study a third arm of comparison included ifosfamide plus CCNU. Ifosfamide gave an extra 78.5 days survival (mean survival time) compared with the placebo group. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group. Pooled analysis was not possible because only mean survival time was reported in both studies for patients with extensive disease. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsChemotherapeutic treatment prolongs survival in comparison with placebo in patients with advanced SCLC. Nevertheless the impact of chemotherapy on quality of life and in patients with poor prognosis is unknown. Well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Small CellHumansIfosfamideLomustineLung NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicIfosfamideLomustine

Identifiers

PMID14583943
OpenAlexW4248940863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.