SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Family intervention for schizophrenia.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of psychological interventions for carers of patients with severe mental illness (SMI): a systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Supportive therapy for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Family intervention for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Problem solving skills for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- Trial
- Family interventions for schizophrenia in Italy: randomized controlled trial.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2007Trial
- Effectiveness of Psychoeducation on Burden among Family Caregivers of Adults with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nursing research and practice · 2023Review
- A Web-Based Intervention for Relatives of People Experiencing Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder: Design Study Using a User-Centered Approach.JMIR mental health · 2018Article
- How Professionals View Multifamily Psychoeducation: A Qualitative Study.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2016Article
- The role of family therapy in the management of schizophrenia: challenges and solutions.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2015Review
- Merging evidence-based psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Article
- [Evidence-based interventions in psychiatric rehabilitation: which ones should we prioritized and why?].Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2014Review
- Schizophrenia--time to commit to policy change.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2014Article
- Definitions and drivers of relapse in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic literature review.Annals of general psychiatry · 2013Article
- Challenges in validating quality of care data in a schizophrenia registry: experience from the Danish National Indicator Project.Clinical epidemiology · 2012Article
- Training health professionals to conduct family education for families of patients with first-episode psychosis: adherence to protocol.Iranian journal of psychiatry · 2010Article
- Frequency and effects of psychosocial interventions additional to olanzapine treatment in routine care of schizophrenic patients.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2008Article
- Psychoeducation: a basic psychotherapeutic intervention for patients with schizophrenia and their families.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2006Review
- [The role of psychoeducation in the treatment of psychiatric inpatients].Der Nervenarzt · 2006Review
- Helping to prioritise interventions for depression and schizophrenia: use of Population Impact Measures.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt has been found that people with schizophrenia from families that express high levels of criticism, hostility, or over involvement, have more frequent relapses than people with similar problems from families that tend to be less expressive of their emotions. Psychosocial interventions designed to reduce these levels of expressed emotions within families now exist. These interventions are proposed as adjuncts rather than alternatives to drug treatments and their main purpose is to decrease the stress within the family and also the rate of relapse.
objectivesTo estimate the effects of family psychosocial interventions in community settings for the care of those with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like conditions compared to standard care. SEARCH STRATEGY: We updated previous searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (June 1998), MEDLINE (1966-1995), the Cochrane Library (Issue 2 1998), EMBASE (1981-1995) and MEDLINE (1966-1995) by searching Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (November 2002). References of all identified studies were searched for further trial citations and authors of trials were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised studies were selected if they focused primarily on families of people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and compared community-orientated family-based psychosocial intervention of more than five sessions with standard care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were reliably extracted, and, where appropriate and possible, summated. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and number needed to treat (NNT) were estimated. The reviewers assume that people who died or dropped out had no improvement and tested the sensitivity of the final results to this assumption. MAIN
resultsFamily intervention may decrease the frequency of relapse (n=721, 14 RCTs, RR 0.72 CI 0.6 to 0.9, NNT 7 CI 5 to 16). These data are statistically heterogeneous, the trend over time of this finding is towards the null and some small but negative studies may not have been identified by the search. Family intervention may also encourage compliance with medication (n=369, 7 RCTs, RR 0.74 CI 0.6 to 0.9, NNT 7 CI 4 to 19) but does not obviously affect the tendency of individuals/families to drop out of care (n=327, 4 RCTs, RR attrition at 3 months 0.86 CI 0.3 to 2.1). It may improve general social impairment and the levels of expressed emotion within the family. This review provides no data to suggest that family intervention either prevents or promotes suicide. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsClinicians, researchers, policy makers and recipients of care cannot be confident of the effects of family intervention from the findings of this review. Further data from already completed trials could greatly inform practice and more trials are justified as long as their participants, interventions and outcomes are applicable to routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14583908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.