Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14583069›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2003

Reducing medication errors: a regional approach for hospitals.

Thomas G McCarter, Richard Centafont, Farrah N Daly, Tobore Kokoricha, John Z Leander Po

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas G McCarterMain Line Health System, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010, USA. mccarter@mlhs.org
Richard Centafont
Farrah N Daly
Tobore Kokoricha
John Z Leander Po

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the Institute of Medicine's report, To Err Is Human, and the subsequent publication, Crossing the Quality Chasm, the subject of reducing medical errors has gained considerable attention from patients, healthcare providers, employers and government organisations in the US. Most nonoperative errors are related to medications. Medication errors lead not only to negative repercussions subjectively experienced by both the patient and the healthcare staff, but also to additional expenditures due to complications. Education, adapting new safety systems and technology, and having clinical pharmacists play a larger role in the medication process can all help in solving the problem of medication errors. Designing and executing a rational system to reduce medication errors is particularly germane in the current era of increased demands for quality healthcare in the setting of cost-containment pressures. In the Delaware Valley (Philadelphia and surrounding area) of Pennsylvania, USA, a consortium of healthcare providers in cooperation with the Health Care Improvement Foundation (HCIF), and two non-profit oganisations--the ECRI (formerly the Emergency Care Research Institute) and the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP)--have combined to establish and promote safe medication practices under a programme known as the Regional Medication Safety Program for Hospitals. At the core of the programme are 16 medication safety goals, which centre on establishing an institutional culture of safety, modifying infrastructure and clinical practice to reflect this culture, and using technology to facilitate these changes. It is believed that this rational campaign to improve patient safety may serve as a paradigm for other regions around the world.

Indexed as

HumansMedical ErrorsMedication ErrorsMedication Systems, HospitalPatient Education as TopicPharmacistsSafety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.