Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14580249›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2003

The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: genetic alterations in pre-invasive lesions.

Jorge S Reis-Filho, Sunil R Lakhani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Clinicopathological Characteristics ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2020
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparative analysis of loss of heterozygosity and expression profile in normal tissue, DCIS and invasive breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jorge S Reis-FilhoThe Breakthrough Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Sunil.Lakhani@icr.ac.uk
Sunil R Lakhani
Breast Cancer Now · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of modern molecular genetic techniques has allowed breast cancer researchers to clarify the multistep model of breast carcinogenesis. Laser capture microdissection coupled with comparative genomic hybridisation and/or loss-of-heterozygosity methods have confirmed that many pre-invasive lesions of the breast harbour chromosomal abnormalities at loci known to be altered in invasive breast carcinomas. Current data do not provide strong evidence for ductal hyperplasia of usual type as a precursor lesion, although some are monoclonal proliferations; however, atypical hyperplasia and in situ carcinoma appear to be nonobligate precursors. We review current knowledge and the contribution of molecular genetics in the understanding of breast cancer precursors and pre-invasive lesions.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingChromosome AberrationsFemaleHumansHyperplasiaLoss of HeterozygosityNeoplasm Invasiveness

Identifiers

PMID14580249
PMCPMC314410
OpenAlexW2129976756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.