Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14580247›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2003

The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: the role of new diagnostic techniques.

Ashutosh Nerurkar, Peter Osin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashutosh NerurkarDepartment of Histopathology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK. Ashutosh.Nerurkar@rmh.nthames.nhs.uk
Peter Osin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years we have seen significantly increased use of minimally invasive diagnostic techniques in the management of breast disease. There is wide recognition of fine needle aspiration and core biopsy as the principal diagnostic methods. However, concerns exist regarding their reliability. This article provides a brief overview of the major diagnostic issues related to use of fine needle aspiration, core biopsy and ductal lavage. It summarizes areas of use for each technique, outlines the main diagnostic pitfalls and their causes, and provides a perspective on future developments in the field.

Indexed as

Biopsy, NeedleBreastBreast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCytodiagnosisFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm InvasivenessReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID14580247
PMCPMC314417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.