Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14578481›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2004

Evidence for the involvement of VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors in pressure-induced vasodilatation in rodents.

Lionel Fizanne, Dominique Sigaudo-Roussel, Jean Louis Saumet, Bérengère Fromy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) Protects Nile Tilapia (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide induces postsynaptically expressed potentiation in the intra-amygdala circuit.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Long-term effects of extrinsic denervation on VIP and substance P innervation in circular muscle of rat jejunum.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2007
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lionel FizanneLaboratory of Physiology, University of Angers, Angers, France.
Dominique Sigaudo-Roussel
Jean Louis Saumet
Bérengère Fromy
Université d'Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A transient increase in skin blood flow in response to an innocuous local pressure application, defined as pressure-induced vasodilatation (PIV), delays the occurrence of ischaemia, suggesting a protective feature against applied pressure. The PIV response depends on capsaicin-sensitive nerve fibres and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been shown to be involved. In these fibres, CGRP coexists with pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP). Three distinct receptors mediate the biological effects of PACAP: VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors binding with the same affinity for PACAP and vasoactive intestinal peptide and PAC1 receptors showing high selectivity for PACAP. Because the receptors are widely expressed in the nervous system and in the skin, we hypothesized that at least one of them is involved in PIV development. To verify this hypothesis, we used [D-p-Cl-Phe(6),Leu(17)]-VIP (nonspecific antagonist of VPAC1/VPAC2 receptors), PG 97-269 (antagonist of VPAC1 receptors), PACAP(6-38) (antagonist of VPAC2/PAC1 receptors) and Max.d.4 (antagonist of PAC1 receptors) in anaesthetized rodents. The blockade of VPAC1/VPAC2, VPAC1 or VPAC2/PAC1 receptors eliminated the PIV response, whereas PAC1 blockade had no effect, demonstrating an involvement of VPAC1/VPAC2 receptors in PIV development. Moreover, endothelium-independent and -dependent vasodilator responses were unchanged by the VPAC1/VPAC2 antagonist. Thus, the absence of a PIV response following VPAC1/VPAC2 blockade cannot be explained by any dysfunction of the vascular smooth muscle or endothelial vasodilator capacity. The involvement of VPAC1/VPAC2 receptors in the development of PIV seems to imply a series relationship in which each receptor type (CGRP, VPAC1, VPAC2) is necessary for the full transmission of the response.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleMicePeptide FragmentsPressureRatsRats, WistarReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal PeptideReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IIReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide, Type IVasoactive Intestinal PeptideVasodilationPeptide FragmentsPG 97-269Receptors, Vasoactive Intestinal PeptideReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IIReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide, Type IVasoactive Intestinal Peptide

Identifiers

PMID14578481
PMCPMC1664759
OpenAlexW1593029693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.