Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14576276›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2003

Convergent neofunctionalization by positive Darwinian selection after ancient recurrent duplications of the xanthine dehydrogenase gene.

Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles, Rosa Tarrío, Francisco J Ayala

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrated structural and evolutionary analysis reveals common mechanisms underlying adaptive evolution in mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evolution ofBioMed research international · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco Rodríguez-TrellesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2525, USA. ftrelles@liag.cesga.es
Rosa Tarrío
Francisco J Ayala
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

POPULATION GENETICS OF SOD, ADH, AND GPDHP01GM042397 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · 1991 to 1995
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM42397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication is a primary source of molecular substrate for the emergence of evolutionary novelties. The chances for redundant gene sequences to evolve new functions are small compared with the probability that the copies become disabled by deleterious mutations. Functional divergence after gene duplication can result in two alternative evolutionary fates: one copy acquires a novel function (neofunctionalization), or each copy adopts part of the tasks of their parental gene (subfunctionalization). The relative prevalence of each outcome is unknown. Similarly unknown is the relative importance of positive selection versus random fixation of neutral mutations. Aldehyde oxidase (Ao) and xanthine dehydrogenase (Xdh) genes encode two complex members of the xanthine oxidase family of molybdo-flavoenzymes that carry different functions. Ao is known to have originated from a duplicate of an Xdh gene in eukaryotes, before the origin of multicellularity. We show that (i) Ao evolved independently twice from two different Xdh paralogs, the second time in the chordates, before the diversification of vertebrates; (ii) after each duplication, the Ao duplicate underwent a period of rapid evolution during which identical sites across the two molecules, involving the flavin adenine dinucleotide and substrate-binding pockets, were subjected to intense positive Darwinian selection; and (iii) the second Ao gene likely endured two periods of redundancy, initially as a duplicate of Xdh and later as a functional equivalent of the old Ao, which is currently absent from the vertebrate genome. Caution is appropriate in structural genomics when using sequence similarity for assigning protein function.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCoenzymesGene DuplicationAldehyde OxidaseAnimalsBinding SitesCattleEvolution, MolecularFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideFlavonoidsLigandsMetalloproteinsMolybdenum CofactorsProtein BindingPteridinesXanthine DehydrogenaseAldehyde OxidaseCoenzymesFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideFlavonoidsLigandsMetalloproteinsMolybdenum CofactorsmolybdopterinPteridinesXanthine Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID14576276
PMCPMC263828
OpenAlexW2051947493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.