Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14576105›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003

Tenofovir resistance and resensitization.

Katharina Wolf, Hauke Walter, Niko Beerenwinkel, Wilco Keulen, Rolf Kaiser, Daniel Hoffmann, Thomas Lengauer, Joachim Selbig, Anne-Mieke Vandamme, Klaus Korn and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. HIV and Drug-Resistant Subtypes.Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Elucidating molecular interactions ofCommunications biology · 2019
    Article
  17. Twenty-Five Years of Lamivudine: Current and Future Use for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Katharina WolfInstitute of Clinical and Molecular Virology, German National Reference Centre for Retroviruses, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Hauke Walter
Niko Beerenwinkel
Wilco Keulen
Rolf Kaiser
Daniel Hoffmann
Thomas Lengauer
Joachim Selbig
Anne-Mieke Vandamme
Klaus Korn
Barbara Schmidt
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEMax Planck Institute for Informatics · DECenter of Advanced European Studies and Research · DEKU Leuven · BEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency viruses in 321 samples from tenofovir-naïve patients were retrospectively evaluated for resistance to this nucleotide analogue. All virus strains with insertions between amino acids 67 and 70 of the reverse transcriptase (n = 6) were highly resistant. Virus strains with the Q151M mutation were divided into susceptible (n = 12) and highly resistant (n = 8) viruses. This difference was due to the absence or presence of the K65R mutation, which was confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis. Viral clones with various combinations of the mutations M41L, K70R, L210W, and T215F or T215Y were analyzed for cross-resistance induced by thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs). The levels of increased resistance induced by single, double, and triple mutations at the indicated positions could be ranked as follows: for mutants with single mutations, mutations at positions 41 > 215 > 70; for mutants with double mutations, mutations at positions 41 and 215 > 70 and 215 = 210 and 215 > 41 and 70; for mutants with triple mutations, mutations at positions 41, 210, and 215 > 41, 70, and 215. Viral clones with M184V or M184I exhibited slightly increased susceptibilities to tenofovir (0.7-fold). Almost all clones with TAM-induced resistance were resensitized when M184V was present (P < 0.001). Among the viruses in the clinical samples, the rate of tenofovir resistance significantly increased with the number of TAMs both in the samples with 184M and in those with 184V (P = 0.005 and P = 0.003, respectively). A resensitizing effect of M184V was confirmed for all samples exhibiting at least one TAM (P = 0.03). However, accumulation of at least two TAMs resulted in more than 2.0-fold reduced susceptibility to tenofovir, irrespective of the presence of M184V. Decision tree building, a classical machine learning technique, was used to generate models for the interpretation of mutations with respect to tenofovir resistance. The application of previously proposed cutoffs for a reduced response to therapy and treatment failure demonstrated the central roles of positions 215 and 65 for 1.5- and 4.0-fold reduced susceptibilities, respectively. Thus, clinically relevant resistance may be conferred by the accumulation of TAMs, and the resensitizing effect of M184V should be considered only minor.

Indexed as

OrganophosphonatesAdenineComputational BiologyDrug Resistance, ViralGenotypeHIV-1HIV Reverse TranscriptaseHumansModels, BiologicalMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationOrganophosphorus CompoundsPhenotypeReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsTenofovirThymidineAdenineHIV Reverse TranscriptaseOrganophosphonatesOrganophosphorus CompoundsReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsTenofovirThymidine

Identifiers

PMID14576105
PMCPMC253768
OpenAlexW2170987946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.