Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14576098›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003

Interlaboratory comparison of agar dilution and Etest methods for determining the MICs of antibiotics used in management of Neisseria meningitidis infections.

Julio A Vázquez, Luisa Arreaza, Colin Block, Ingrid Ehrhard, Stephen J Gray, Sigrid Heuberger, Steen Hoffmann, Paula Kriz, Pierre Nicolas, Per Olcen and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  3. Recent Evolution of Susceptibility to Beta-Lactams inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Susceptibilities of invasiveJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2021
    Article
  5. Antibiotic susceptibility and molecular analysis of invasive Neisseria meningitidis recovered in the Republic of Ireland, 1996 to 2016.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Julio A VázquezNational Institute of Health Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. jvazquez@iscii.es
Luisa Arreaza
Colin Block
Ingrid Ehrhard
Stephen J Gray
Sigrid Heuberger
Steen Hoffmann
Paula Kriz
Pierre Nicolas
Per Olcen
Anna Skoczynska
Lodewijk Spanjaard
Paola Stefanelli
Muhamed-Kheir Taha
Georgina Tzanakaki
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHadassah Academic College · ILInstitut Pasteur · FRIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITNational Institute of Public Health · PLNational School of Public Health · GRÖrebro University Hospital · SEStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that there is considerable variation in the methods and media used to determine the susceptibility of Neisseria meningitidis to antimicrobial agents in different countries. In this study, national and regional reference laboratories used a standardized methodology to determine the MICs of antibiotics used in the management of meningococcal infection. Fourteen laboratories participated in the study, determining the susceptibility to penicillin G, rifampin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin of a collection of 17 meningococci, of which 11 strains were previously defined as having intermediate resistance to penicillin (Pen(I)) by sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the penA gene. The MIC was determined by agar dilution and Etest with Mueller-Hinton agar (MH), MH supplemented with sheep blood (MH+B), and MH supplemented with heated (chocolated) blood. Several laboratories encountered problems obtaining confluent growth with unsupplemented MH. MH+B was considered to give the most congruent and reproducible results among the study laboratories. The modal MIC for MH+B for each antibiotic and method was calculated to define the MIC consensus, allowing assessment of each individual laboratory's data in relation to the others. The agreement in each antibiotic/method/medium combination was defined as the percentage of laboratories with a result within one dilution of the modal result. For the whole study, an agreement of 90.6% was observed between agar dilution and Etest methods. The agreement in each laboratory/antibiotic/method combination ranged from 98.2% to 69.7%, with six laboratories demonstrating agreement higher than 90% and 11 more than 80%. The ability of the laboratories to detect the Pen(I) isolates ranged from 18.2% to 100%. The apparent difficulty in interpreting susceptibility to rifampin, particularly with the Etest method, is very interesting.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCulture MediaEuropeMeningococcal InfectionsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNeisseria meningitidisPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthReference StandardsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID14576098
PMCPMC253763
OpenAlexW2118241771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.