Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14574465›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2004

Spatial relationships between masticatory muscles and their innervating nerves in man with special reference to the medial pterygoid muscle and its accessory muscle bundle.

Y Sakamoto, K Akita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computed tomography-guided 3D printed patient-specific regional anesthesia.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mandibular nerve entrapment in the infratemporal fossa.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2011
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Y SakamotoUnit of Biostructural Science, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8549 Tokyo, Japan. y.sakamoto.bss@tmd.ac.jp
K Akita

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationships between the positional arrangement of the surrounding and innervating nerves of the muscles supplied by the mandibular nerve, in particular those medial to the main trunk of the nerve, were examined in 24 head halves from 12 Japanese cadavers by dissection from the inside after removal of the bony elements except for the mandible. In ten sides of five heads, the lingual nerve pierced the medial pterygoid muscle, and the bundle lateral to the nerve was found to be separated as an accessory muscle bundle. The accessory bundle was frequently attached to the mylohyoid muscle. In addition, the inferior alveolar nerve and the lingual nerve frequently communicated, and in four specimens a branch from the lingual nerve entered the mylohyoid to communicate with the proper nerve. The innervation pattern indicated that the medial pterygoid muscle consists of the anteromedial and the posterolateral main parts, and sometimes has an accessory bundle. Based on the present findings and the previous studies of the positional relationships between the muscles and nerves by our research group, we propose that the muscles innervated by the mandibular nerve could be classified as an inner group (the lateral pterygoid) and an outer group (the other muscles). A possible scheme of the positional relationships between the muscles and nerves is presented.

Indexed as

AgedCadaverFemaleHumansMaleMandibular NerveMasticatory MusclesPterygoid Muscles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.