ArticleFamilial cancer2003
An audit of familial juvenile polyposis at the Tel Aviv Medical Center: demographic, genetic and clinical features.
Article in Familial cancer, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Juvenile polyposis, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, and early onset colorectal cancer in patients with SMAD4 mutation.Journal of gastroenterology · 2012Article
- Article
- Familial adenomatous polyposis: The practical applications of clinical and molecular screening.Familial cancer · 2006Review
- Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in the hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome.Digestive diseases and sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Familial juvenile polyposis (JP) is an uncommon genetic disorder that, if untreated, can lead to gastrointestinal cancer. To evaluate familial JP prevalence, phenotypic manifestations, causative mutations, treatment and compliance for diagnosis and follow-up in our registry. Since 1993 our familial JP patients were registered, followed-up before and/or after surgery and their families encouraged to have mutation analysis, endoscopic screening and treatment. Ten pedigrees were identified, all Jewish, but only one was Ashkenazi, six were Sepharadi and three were Oriental; the only mutation found was BMPR1A in two of six pedigrees examined. Of 139 first-degree relatives at risk for JP, 62 (45%) had JP or cancer; 56 (40.3%) were available for follow-up and 35 entered the registry. Of these, 71% reported rectal bleeding, 40% had <20 colonic polyps, 31% had 20-100 polyps; 2 had >100 gastric polyps. Cancer occurred in 22.9% (6 colonic, 2 gastric) before familial JP diagnosis or during follow-up elsewhere or non-compliance for follow-up; however, 1 gastric cancer developed during our treatment. In 46% the initial clinical-pathological diagnosis was incorrect. Compliance for evaluation and follow-up of pedigree members and individual familial JP patients was inadequate in 20% and 26%, respectively. Familial JP does not occur in the Israeli Ashkenazi Jewish population at the expected proportion; it is often misdiagnosed and is inadequately recognized in Israeli non-Jews. Mutations were identified in only a minority of pedigrees despite comprehensive screening. The inadequate compliance for screening and follow-up needs to be addressed by educating the public, health care workers and health insurances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.