Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14570595›Full record

ReviewHealth and quality of life outcomes2003

Outcomes and quality of life following breast cancer treatment in older women: when, why, how much, and what do women want?

Jeanne Mandelblatt, Melissa Figueiredo, Jennifer Cullen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. A randomized controlled trial of a support group intervention on the quality of life and fatigue in women after primary treatment for early breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Surviving and thriving after breast cancer treatment.The Medical journal of Australia · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Family interactions in childhood leukemia: an exploratory descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  10. Measuring the quality of surgical decisions for Latina breast cancer patients.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cross-cultural evaluation of the French version of the LEIPAD, a health-related quality of life instrument for use in the elderly living at home.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Do breast cancer survivors increase their physical activity and enhance their health-related quality of life after attending community-based wellness workshops?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012
    Article
  16. Health-related quality of life and cancer clinical trials.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeanne MandelblattDepartment of Oncology and Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. mandelbj@georgetown.edu
Melissa Figueiredo
Jennifer Cullen
Georgetown University Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few comprehensive reviews of breast cancer outcomes in older women. We synthesize data to describe key findings and gaps in knowledge about the outcomes of breast cancer in this population.

methodsWe reviewed research published between 1995 and June 2003 on breast cancer quality of life and outcomes among women aged 65 and older treated for breast cancer. Outcomes included communication, satisfaction, and multiple quality of life domains.

resultsFew randomized trials or cohort studies that measured quality of life after treatment focused exclusively on older women. Studies from older women generally noted that, with the exception of axillary dissection, type of surgical treatment generally had no effect on long-term outcomes. In contrast, the processes of care, such as choosing therapy, good patient-physician communication, receiving treatment concordant with preferences about body image, and low perceptions of bias, were associated with better quality of life and satisfaction.

conclusionsWith the exception of axillary dissection, the processes of care, and not the therapy itself, seem to be the most important determinants of long-term quality of life in older women.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentHealth Services Needs and DemandQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overBody ImageBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicCost of IllnessFemaleHealth Services for the AgedHumansMental HealthPersonal SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID14570595
PMCPMC222918
OpenAlexW2101496095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.