Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14570130›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2002

Kinetics of experimental infection of sheep with Ehrlichia ruminantium cultivated in tick and mammalian cell lines.

Milagros Postigo, Lesley Bell-Sakyi, Edith Paxton, Keith Sumption

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Milagros PostigoCentre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK. mpostigo@staffmail.ed.ac.uk
Lesley Bell-Sakyi
Edith Paxton
Keith Sumption
University of Edinburgh · GBRoslin Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inoculation of sheep with Ehrlichia (previously Cowdria) ruminantium which has been cultivated in mammalian endothelial cell cultures is almost always followed by a severe clinical reaction, whereas inoculation of the agent cultivated in tick cell lines usually does not provoke a clinical response, but may result in seroconversion and/or protection against subsequent challenge with virulent stabilates. A quantitative, real-time PCR assay was developed to determine the kinetics of infection (rickettsaemia) in sheep inoculated with tick cell- and mammalian cell-derived E. ruminantium (Gardel isolate). The method and initial results are described, and the significance of the findings is discussed in relation to the clinical responses of the sheep.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCattleCells, CulturedDNA, BacterialEhrlichia ruminantiumHeartwater DiseaseIxodidaeKineticsPolymerase Chain ReactionSheepSheep DiseasesTick-Borne DiseasesDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID14570130
OpenAlexW2024736657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.