ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2003
Bacterial meningitis: diagnosis and treatment.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of serum procalcitonin for intracranial infection in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Equines: A Growing Threat to Horse Health and Beyond-A Comprehensive Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial meningitis, once almost universally fatal, remains a cause of serious neurologic illness and subsequent disability. The initial diagnosis, although sometimes clear-cut, can be subtle and difficult. Appropriate intervention may have a favorable influence on outcome. The advent of corticosteroids and brain imaging has improved management but created controversy concerning the sequence at which various interventions should be introduced. Empiric treatment with antibiotics is important in the initial stages. Complications can arise, such as seizures, increased intracranial pressure, and ischemia. The prognosis remains unfavorable for some affected individuals in spite of advances in antibiotic management and supportive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14565899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.