Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14563680›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2003

Meiotic double-strand breaks at the interface of chromosome movement, chromosome remodeling, and reductional division.

Aurora Storlazzi, Sophie Tessé, Silvana Gargano, Françoise James, Nancy Kleckner, Denise Zickler

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Diffusion and distal linkages govern interchromosomal dynamics during meiotic prophase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The cohesin complex in mammalian meiosis.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Aurora StorlazziInstitut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Unite Mixte de Recherche 8621, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France.
Sophie Tessé
Silvana Gargano
Françoise James
Nancy Kleckner
Denise Zickler
Université Paris-Sud · FRInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics · ITHarvard University · US

Funding

ILLEGITIMATE RECOMBINATION BY DRUG RESISTANCE ELEMENTSR01GM025326 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI KLECKNER, NANCY E · 1985 to 2019
$12.5M
ILLEGITIMATE RECOMBINATION BY DRUG RESISTANCE ELEMENTSR37GM025326 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI KLECKNER, NANCY E. · 1991 to 2000
$656k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM25326NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM025326NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM025326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal processes related to formation and function of meiotic chiasmata have been analyzed in Sordaria macrospora. Double-strand breaks (DSBs), programmed or gamma-rays-induced, are found to promote four major events beyond recombination and accompanying synaptonemal complex formation: (1) juxtaposition of homologs from long-distance interactions to close presynaptic coalignment at midleptotene; (2) structural destabilization of chromosomes at leptotene/zygotene, including sister axis separation and fracturing, as revealed in a mutant altered in the conserved, axis-associated cohesin-related protein Spo76/Pds5p; (3) exit from the bouquet stage, with accompanying global chromosome movements, at zygotene/pachytene (bouquet stage exit is further found to be a cell-wide regulatory transition and DSB transesterase Spo11p is suggested to have a new noncatalytic role in this transition); (4) normal occurrence of both meiotic divisions, including normal sister separation. Functional interactions between DSBs and the spo76-1 mutation suggest that Spo76/Pds5p opposes local destabilization of axes at developing chiasma sites and raise the possibility of a regulatory mechanism that directly monitors the presence of chiasmata at metaphase I. Local chromosome remodeling at DSB sites appears to trigger an entire cascade of chromosome movements, morphogenetic changes, and regulatory effects that are superimposed upon a foundation of DSB-independent processes.

Indexed as

DNA DamageChromatinChromosome MappingChromosomesCrossing Over, GeneticEndodeoxyribonucleasesEsterasesMeiosisMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11MutationRadiation, IonizingSordarialesChromatinEndodeoxyribonucleasesEsterasesMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11

Identifiers

PMID14563680
PMCPMC280617
OpenAlexW2153079146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.