Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14562388›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2003

Distribution of cagG gene in Helicobacter pylori isolates from Chinese patients with different gastroduodenal diseases and its clinical and pathological significance.

Can Xu, Zhao-Shen Li, Zhen-Xing Tu, Guo-Ming Xu, Yan-Fang Gong, Xiao-Hua Man

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Can XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. xucan9@hotmail.com
Zhao-Shen Li
Zhen-Xing Tu
Guo-Ming Xu
Yan-Fang Gong
Xiao-Hua Man

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the distribution of cagG gene of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) isolates cultured from patients with various digestive diseases and its relationship with gastroduodenal diseases.

methodscagG was amplified by polymerase chain reaction in 145 H pylori isolates cultured from patients with chronic gastritis (n=72), duodenal ulcer (n=48), gastric ulcer (n=17), or gastric and duodenal ulcer (n=8), and the relationship between cagG status and the grade of gastric mucosal inflammation was determined.

resultscagG was present in 91.7% of the 145 H pylori isolates, with the rates were 90.3%, 93.8%, 88.2% and 100.0%, respectively, in those from patients with chronic gastritis, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, and gastric and duodenal ulcer. There was no significant difference among the four groups (P>0.05). The average grade of gastric mucosal inflammation in the antrum and corpus was 1.819+/-0.325 and 1.768+/-0.312, respectively in cagG positive patients, whereas the average inflammation grade was 1.649+/-0.297, 1.598+/-0.278 respectively in cagG negative cases (P>0.05).

conclusioncagG gene of H pylori was quite conservative, and most H pylori strains in Chinese patients were cagG positive. cagG status was not related to clinical outcome or the degree of gastric mucosal inflammation. Therefore, cagG can not be used as a single marker for discrimination of H pylori strains with respect to a specific digestive disease.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedAsian PeopleFemaleGastric MucosaGastritisHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptic UlcerPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID14562388
PMCPMC4656473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.