Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14561839›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2003

Stimulation of proteinase-activated receptor 2 excites jejunal afferent nerves in anaesthetised rats.

Anthony J Kirkup, Wen Jiang, Nigel W Bunnett, David Grundy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms underlying the neuronal-based symptoms of allergy.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Mast cells in gastrointestinal disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony J KirkupDepartment of Biomedical Science, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Wen Jiang
Nigel W Bunnett
David Grundy
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

PROTEINASE-ACTIVATED RECEPTORS/PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEMR01DK057840 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUNNETT, NIGEL W · 2000 to 2010
$2.2M
REGULATION OF SIGNALING BY CELL SURFACE PROTEOLYSISR01DK043207 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUNNETT, NIGEL W · 1993 to 2011
$1.7M
REGULATION OF SIGNALING BY CELL-SURFACE PROTEOLYSISR56DK043207 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUNNETT, NIGEL W · 2010 to 2010
$348k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK43207NIDDK NIH HHS DK57840NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK043207NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK057840NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK043207Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteinase-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) is a receptor for mast cell tryptase and trypsins and might participate in brain-gut communication. However, evidence that PAR2 activation can lead to afferent impulse generation is lacking. To address this issue, we examined the sensitivity of jejunal afferent nerves to a hexapeptide agonist of PAR2, SLIGRL-NH2, and the modulation of the resulting response to treatment with drugs and vagotomy. Multiunit recordings of jejunal afferent activity were made using extracellular recording techniques in anaesthetised male rats. SLIGRL-NH2 (0.001-1 mg kg-1, I.V.) increased jejunal afferent firing and intrajejunal pressure. The reverse peptide sequence (1 mg kg-1, I.V.), which does not stimulate PAR2, was inactive. Naproxen (10 mg kg-1, I.V.), but not a cocktail of omega-conotoxins GVIA and SVIB (each at 25 mug kg-1, I.V.), curtailed both the afferent response and the intrajejunal pressure rise elicited by the PAR2 agonist. Although neither treatment modulated the peak magnitude of the afferent firing, they each altered the intestinal motor response, unmasking an initial inhibitory component. Nifedipine (1 mg kg-1, I.V.) reduced the peak magnitude of the afferent nerve discharge and abolished the initial rise in intrajejunal pressure produced by SLIGRL-NH2. Vagotomy did not significantly influence the magnitude of the afferent response to the PAR2 agonist, which involves a contribution from capsaicin-sensitive fibres. In conclusion, intravenous administration of SLIGRL-NH2 evokes complex activation of predominantly spinally projecting extrinsic intestinal afferent nerves, an effect that involves both direct and indirect mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBlood PressureCalcium Channel BlockersDose-Response Relationship, DrugHeart RateJejunumMaleMesenteryMotor NeuronsNaproxenNerve FibersNeurons, Afferentomega-ConotoxinsRatsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCalcium Channel BlockersNaproxenomega-ConotoxinsReceptor, PAR-2Substance P

Identifiers

PMID14561839
PMCPMC2343395
OpenAlexW2154034046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.