Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14558988›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2003

Newer pharmaceutical agents to treat lipid disorders.

Michael H Davidson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael H DavidsonRush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 1159, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. michaeldavidson@radiantresearch.com
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines and the results of the Heart Protection Study have provided a stronger rationale to more aggressively treat high-risk patients to a low-density (LDL) cholesterol goal of less than 100 mL/dL. Two new therapies, ezetimibe and rosuvastatin, have recently been added to the lipid-lowering armamentarium to improve guideline adherence. Ezetimibe, a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor, lowers LDL by 18% to 20% and can be used safely in combination with statins. Adding ezetimibe to a statin is comparable with the LDL-lowering efficacy of tripling the dose of the statin. Rosuvastatin is a highly efficacious statin providing 8% greater LDL reduction than equivalent doses of atorvastatin, and the starting dose of 10 mg/d provides nearly a 50% reduction in LDL cholesterol. There are several investigational drugs in development for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis. Of these investigational drugs, the most promising are the cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors, which have the potential to significantly raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and acetyl-coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitors, which may directly inhibit the progression of atherosclerosis.

Indexed as

Anticholesteremic AgentsAzetidinesEzetimibeFluorobenzenesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHyperlipidemiasPyrimidinesRosuvastatin CalciumSulfonamidesAnticholesteremic AgentsAzetidinesEzetimibeFluorobenzenesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrimidinesRosuvastatin CalciumSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID14558988
OpenAlexW1996454544

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.