Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14557642›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2003

Multigene DNA priming-boosting vaccines protect macaques from acute CD4+-T-cell depletion after simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6P mucosal challenge.

N A Doria-Rose, C Ohlen, P Polacino, C C Pierce, M T Hensel, L Kuller, T Mulvania, D Anderson, P D Greenberg, S-L Hu and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N A Doria-RoseSeattle Biomedical Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
C Ohlen
P Polacino
C C Pierce
M T Hensel
L Kuller
T Mulvania
D Anderson
P D Greenberg
S-L Hu
N L Haigwood
Center for Infectious Disease Research · USOregon National Primate Research Center · US

Funding

RECOMBINANT DNA-DERIVED PERTUSSIS SUBUNIT VACCINER43AI023566 · NIAID · AMGEN, INC. · PI BURNETTE, WALTER N · 1986 to 1986
–
NCI NIH HHS T32CA0922925NIAID NIH HHS P01-AI-23566NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI27577PHS HHS T32A107509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated four priming-boosting vaccine regimens for the highly pathogenic simian human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6P in Macaca nemestrina. Each regimen included gene gun delivery of a DNA vaccine expressing all SHIV89.6 genes plus Env gp160 of SHIV89.6P. Additional components were two recombinant vaccinia viruses, expressing SHIV89.6 Gag-Pol or Env gp160, and inactivated SHIV89.6 virus. We compared (i) DNA priming/DNA boosting, (ii) DNA priming/inactivated virus boosting, (iii) DNA priming/vaccinia virus boosting, and (iv) vaccinia virus priming/DNA boosting versus sham vaccines in groups of 6 macaques. Prechallenge antibody responses to Env and Gag were strongest in the groups that received vaccinia virus priming or boosting. Cellular immunity to SHIV89.6 peptides was measured by enzyme-linked immunospot assay; strong responses to Gag and Env were found in 9 of 12 vaccinia virus vaccinees and 1 of 6 DNA-primed/inactivated-virus-boosted animals. Vaccinated macaques were challenged intrarectally with 50 50% animal infectious doses of SHIV89.6P 3 weeks after the last immunization. All animals became infected. Five of six DNA-vaccinated and 5 of 6 DNA-primed/particle-boosted animals, as well as all 6 controls, experienced severe CD4(+)-T-cell loss in the first 3 weeks after infection. In contrast, DNA priming/vaccinia virus boosting and vaccinia virus priming/DNA boosting vaccines both protected animals from disease: 11 of 12 macaques had no loss of CD4(+) T cells or moderate declines. Virus loads in plasma at the set point were significantly lower in vaccinia virus-primed/DNA-boosted animals versus controls (P = 0.03). We conclude that multigene vaccines delivered by a combination of vaccinia virus and gene gun-delivered DNA were effective against SHIV89.6P viral challenge in M. nemestrina.

Indexed as

Immunization, SecondaryAIDS VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralBiolisticsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesHIV-1HIV Envelope Protein gp160HIV InfectionsHumansImmunity, CellularImmunizationMacaca nemestrinaSAIDS VaccinesSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralHIV Envelope Protein gp160SAIDS VaccinesVaccines, DNAViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID14557642
PMCPMC229261
OpenAlexW2144687970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.