Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14557296›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2003

Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis.

Mehmet Tanyuksel, William A Petri

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 483 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antiamoebic drugs for treating amoebic colitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Colonoscopic diagnosis of amebiasis: a case series and systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genotypic characterization ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Amebic liver abscess: An update.World journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mehmet TanyukselDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik, Ankara 06018, Turkey.
William A Petri
Turkish Armed Forces · TR

Funding

FIELD STUDIES OF IMMUNITY TO AMEBIASIS IN BANGLADESHR01AI043596 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI CAROL A GILCHRIST, William A Petri · 1998 to 2026
$7.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI043596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of Entamoeba histolytica, the causative agent of amebiasis, is an important goal of the clinical microbiology laboratory. To assess the scope of E. histolytica infection, it is necessary to utilize accurate diagnostic tools. As more is discovered about the molecular and cell biology of E. histolytica, there is great potential for further understanding the pathogenesis of amebiasis. Molecular biology-based diagnosis may become the technique of choice in the future because establishment of these protozoa in culture is still not a routine clinical laboratory process. In all cases, combination of serologic tests with detection of the parasite (by antigen detection or PCR) offers the best approach to diagnosis, while PCR techniques remain impractical in many developing country settings. The detection of amebic markers in serum in patients with amebic colitis and liver abscess appears promising but is still only a research tool. On the other hand, stool antigen detection tests offer a practical, sensitive, and specific way for the clinical laboratory to detect intestinal E. histolytica. All the current tests suffer from the fact that the antigens detected are denatured by fixation of the stool specimen, limiting testing to fresh or frozen samples.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Laboratory TechniquesEntamoebaEntamoeba histolyticaEntamoebiasisHumansParasitology

Identifiers

PMID14557296
PMCPMC207118
OpenAlexW2139360852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.