Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14551775›Full record

ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2003

Dual effect of temperature on the human epithelial Na+ channel.

Ahmed Chraïbi, Jean-Daniel Horisberger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physiological mechanisms determining eccrine sweat composition.European journal of applied physiology · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modulation of taste processing by temperature.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. CPT-cGMP Is A New Ligand of Epithelial Sodium Channels.International journal of biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed ChraïbiInstitut de Pharmacologie et de Toxicologie, Université de Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 27, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Daniel Horisberger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) is the rate-limiting step for sodium reabsorption in the distal segments of the nephron, in the colon and in the airways. Its activity is regulated by intracellular and extracellular factors but the mechanisms of this regulation are not yet completely understood. Recently, we have shown that the fast regulation of ENaC by the extracellular [Na+], a phenomenon termed self-inhibition, is temperature dependent. In the present study we examined the effects of temperature on the single-channel properties of ENaC. Single-channel recordings from excised patches showed that the channel open probability (Po, estimated from the number of open channels N.Po, where N is the total number of channels) increased on average two- to threefold while the single-channel conductance decreased by about half when the temperature of the perfusion solution was lowered from approximately 30 to approximately 15 degrees C. The effects of temperature on the single-channel conductance and Po explain the changes of the macroscopic current that can be observed upon temperature changes and, in particular, the paradoxical effect of temperature on the current carried by ENaC.

Indexed as

TemperatureAmilorideAnimalsEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansIon Channel GatingOocytesSodium ChannelsXenopus laevisAmilorideSodium Channels

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.