Is concordance the primrose path to health?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Dynamics of doctor-patient relationship: A cross-sectional study on concordance, trust, and patient enablement.Journal of family & community medicine · 2012
   Article
2. Priority setting in general practice: health priorities of older patients differ from treatment priorities of their physicians.Croatian medical journal · 2010
   Article
3. "Compliance" to "concordance": a critical view.The Journal of medical humanities · 2007
   Review
4. Optimal management of asthma in elderly patients: strategies to improve adherence to recommended interventions.Drugs & aging · 2007
   Review
5. Promoting health literacy.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as