Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14532367›Full record

ArticleQuality & safety in health care2003

Ethnic specific recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a first exploratory comparison between guidelines from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands.

D R Manna, M A Bruijnzeels, H G A Mokkink, M Berg

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Quality & safety in health care, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond translation: Engaging with culturally and linguistically diverse consumers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  7. Rural, suburban, and urban differences in factors that impact physician adherence to clinical preventive service guidelines.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2014
    Article
  8. Advancing knowledge translation in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D R MannaDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Manna@bmg.eur.nl
M A Bruijnzeels
H G A Mokkink
M Berg
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate whether clinical practice guidelines in different countries take ethnic differences between patients into consideration and to assess the scientific foundation of such ethnic specific recommendations.

designAnalysis of the primary care sections of clinical practice guidelines.

settingPrimary care practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and asthma developed in the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands.

main outcome measuresEnumeration of the ethnic specific information and recommendations in the guidelines, and the scientific basis and strength of this evidence.

resultsDifferent guidelines do address ethnic differences between patients, but to a varying extent. The USA guidelines contained the most ethnic specific statements and the Dutch guidelines the least. Most ethnic specific statements were backed by scientific evidence, usually arising from descriptive studies or narrative reviews.

conclusionThe attention given to ethnic differences between patients in clinical guidelines varies between countries. Guideline developers should be aware of the potential problems of ignoring differences in ethnicity.

Indexed as

EthnicityPractice Guidelines as TopicAsthmaCanadaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Evidence-Based MedicineHealth Services ResearchHumansHypertensionNetherlandsPrimary Health CareUnited KingdomUnited States

Identifiers

PMID14532367
PMCPMC1743772
OpenAlexW2147291609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.