Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14532247›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Detection of Yersinia pestis in sputum by real-time PCR.

Caroline Loïez, Stéphanie Herwegh, Frédéric Wallet, Sylvie Armand, Françoise Guinet, René J Courcol

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multiplex PCR System for the Diagnosis of Plague.Current molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Obtaining Specific Sequence Tags forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Yersinia pestis: the Natural History of Plague.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  9. Biomolecules · 2020
    Review
  10. Human plague: An old scourge that needs new answers.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline LoïezLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.
Stéphanie Herwegh
Frédéric Wallet
Sylvie Armand
Françoise Guinet
René J Courcol
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRInserm · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 5' nuclease PCR assay for detection of the Yersinia pestis plasminogen activator (pla) gene in human respiratory specimens with simulated Y. pestis infection was developed. An internal positive control was added to the reaction mixture in order to detect the presence of PCR inhibitors that are often found in biological samples. The assay was 100% specific for Y. pestis. In the absence of inhibitors, a sensitivity of 10(2) CFU/ml of respiratory fluid was obtained. When inhibitors were present, detection of Y. pestis DNA required a longer sample treatment time and an initial concentration of bacteria of at least 10(4) CFU/ml. The test's total turnaround time was less than 5 h. The assay described here is well suited to the rapid diagnosis of pneumonic plague, the form of plague most likely to result from a bioterrorist attack.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialHumansPhosphodiesterase IPlaguePlasminogen ActivatorsPolymerase Chain ReactionSputumYersinia pestisDNA, BacterialPhosphodiesterase IPlasminogen Activators

Identifiers

PMID14532247
PMCPMC254301
OpenAlexW2140844586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.