ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003
Comparison of in vitro activities of 17 antifungal drugs against a panel of 20 dermatophytes by using a microdilution assay.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- A pilot single centre, double blind, placebo controlled, randomized, parallel study of Calmagen® dermaceutical cream and lotion for the topical treatment of tinea and onychomycosis.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2017Trial
- First Report ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Potential of Chemical and Physical Enhancers for Transungual Delivery of Amorolfine Hydrochloride.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Antifungal drug susceptibility profile of clinically important dermatophytes and determination of point mutations in terbinafine-resistant isolates.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018Article
- Molecular Characterization and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of 316 Clinical Isolates of Dermatophytes in Iran.Mycopathologia · 2016Article
- Investigation of In Vitro Activity of Five Antifungal Drugs against Dermatophytes Species Isolated from Clinical Samples Using the E-Test Method.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2014Article
- In-vitro Activity of 10 Antifungal Agents against 320 Dermatophyte Strains Using Microdilution Method in Tehran.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2013Article
- Comparative evaluation of effectivity and safety of topical amorolfine and clotrimazole in the treatment of tinea corporis.Indian journal of dermatology · 2011Article
- Comparison of the activities of four antifungal agents in an in vitro model of dermatophyte nail infection.Indian journal of dermatology · 2008Article
- In vitro activities of miltefosine and two novel antifungal biscationic salts against a panel of 77 dermatophytes.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2007Article
- Amino acid substitution in Trichophyton rubrum squalene epoxidase associated with resistance to terbinafine.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2005Article
- Evaluation of broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing conditions for Trichophyton rubrum.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
- In vitro analysis of the ability of Trichophyton rubrum to become resistant to terbinafine.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2003Article
- Antifungal Resistance in Dermatology.Indian journal of dermatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The in vitro activities of 17 antifungal drugs against a panel of 20 dermatophytes comprising 6 different species were determined using a microdilution assay according to the NCCLS M38-P method with some modifications. Terbinafine was the most potent systemic drug while tolnaftate and amorolfine were the most active topical agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.