Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14530963›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2003

Transcriptional regulation of the human LINE-1 retrotransposon L1.2B.

C Steinhoff, W A Schulz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Epigenetic mechanisms in mammals.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2009
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C SteinhoffUrologische Klinik und Biologisch-Medizinisches Forschungszentrum, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. christine.steinhoff@molgen.mpg.de
W A Schulz
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although LINE-1 (L1) sequences constitute the most important family of retrotransposons in the human genome, their transcriptional regulation is poorly understood. Specifically, their unusual internal promoter is incompletely characterized. Current promoter prediction programs fail to identify the promoter in the 5'UTR of the active LINE-1 element L1.2B. Experimental investigation of this promoter using reporter gene assays in various human and murine cell types confirmed that the promoter consists of two segments, and demonstrated that the distal portion is essential for cell-type-independent activity. No differences in promoter activity were found between normal and transformed cells. The complete promoter was shown to possess approximately 20% of the activity of the strong early promoter of cytomegalovirus, and to be capable of directing the expression of levels of p53 sufficient to kill normal and transformed human cells. Thus, active LINE-1 elements contain highly active promoters capable of driving cell-type-independent expression, which are of potential use in mammalian expression constructs. In vitro methylation of the promoter at HpaII sites decreased its activity independently of cell type, but this repression was alleviated in MBD2-/- cells. Surprisingly, mutation of specific HpaII sites was also found to reduce promoter activity. Thus, efficient repression of the L1.2B promoter by DNA methylation may involve MBD2 binding, but at least one HpaII site also appears to be involved specifically in transcriptional activation. Since neither promoter activity nor the efficiency of repression by methylation differed between normal and tumor cells, the re-activation of LINE-1 sequences observed in tumor cells is probably caused by hypomethylation of the promoter.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsTranscription, GeneticCell Line, TumorDNA MethylationHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticTransfection

Identifiers

PMID14530963
OpenAlexW2015046492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.