ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2003
Clinical significance of sentinel lymph node involvement in malignant melanoma.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the period 1997-2002, sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery was performed on 179 primary skin melanoma patients, one to two months after the removal of the primary. Staining with patent blue was combined with an isotope technique. Histological evaluation of the sentinel lymph nodes was performed in serial sections. Immunohistochemical detection of S100, HMB-45, or Melan-A was used in the case of suspected micrometastases. Demonstration of positive sentinel lymph node was followed, preferably within 2-3 weeks, by regional block dissection. In these cases interferon-a2 in low doses or BCG immune therapy were applied as adjuvant therapy. Bimonthly follow-up of the patients included physical examination and the use of imaging techniques as specified in the melanoma protocol. Sentinel lymph node surgery was successful in 177/179 cases (98%). Positive sentinel lymph node was identified in 26/177 patients (14.7%). In node positive patients the thickness of the primary tumour was significantly greater than that of node negative ones (p<0.00001). Patients with micrometastases had significantly poorer symptom-free and overall survival by the Mantel-Cox test than those of the other group (p=0.0001 and p=0.0007 respectively). Comparison of the tumor thickness and positive SLN by discriminance analysis, yielded 81.7% and 79.9%, respectively for correct classification rates. Based on our study and data from the literature, we suggest SLN-positivity as equally strong poor prognosis factor for skin melanoma as the tumor thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14530813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.