ArticleAnnals of surgery2003
Clinical and pathologic response of Barrett's esophagus to laparoscopic antireflux surgery.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Guideline
- Treatment for Barrett's oesophagus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- The effect of antireflux surgery on esophageal carcinogenesis in patients with barrett esophagus: a systematic review.Annals of surgery · 2007Pooled it
- Medical or surgical management of GERD patients with Barrett's esophagus: the LOTUS trial 3-year experience.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2008Trial
- Efficacy of Nissen fundoplication versus medical therapy in the regression of low-grade dysplasia in patients with Barrett esophagus: a prospective study.Annals of surgery · 2006Trial
- Antireflux Surgery's Lifespan: 20 Years After Laparoscopic Fundoplication.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Article
- Antireflux surgery to prevent the progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma: yes or no?Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Reflux, Barrett's Esophagus, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Bariatric Surgery.Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Magnetic sphincter augmentation with hiatal hernia repair: long term outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Regression of Barrett's esophagus after magnetic sphincter augmentation: intermediate-term results.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Impact of Gastric Bypass on Erosive Esophagitis and Barret's Esophagus.Obesity surgery · 2020Article
- FAILURE AFTER FUNDOPLICATION: RE-FUNDOPLICATION? IS THERE A ROOM FOR GASTRECTOMY? IN WHICH CLINICAL SCENARIES?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2019Article
- Current Concepts in Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus With and Without Dysplasia.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017Review
- From Heartburn to Barrett's Esophagus, and Beyond.World journal of surgery · 2017Review
- Barrett's esophagus after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: does regression occur?Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Pre-operative clinical and instrumental factors as antireflux surgery outcome predictors.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2016Review
- The use of crural relaxing incisions with biologic mesh reinforcement during laparoscopic repair of complex hiatal hernias.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- The patterns of reflux can affect regression of non-dysplastic and low-grade dysplastic Barrett's esophagus after medical and surgical treatment: a prospective case-control study.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
- Antireflux surgery for dysplastic Barrett.World journal of surgery · 2015Review
- Esophageal COX-2 expression is increased in Barrett's esophagus, obesity, and smoking.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background dataPatients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) are frequently offered laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) to treat symptoms. The effectiveness of this operation with regards to symptoms and to the evolution of the columnar-lined epithelium remains controversial.
methodsWe analyzed the course of 106 consecutive patients with BE who underwent LARS between 1994 and 2000, representing 14% of all LARS (754) performed in our institution during that period. All 106 patients agreed to clinical follow-up in 2002 at 40 months (median; range, 12-95 months). Fifty-three patients (50%) agreed to functional evaluation (manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring); 90 patients (85%) to thorough endoscopy, with appropriate biopsies and histologic evaluation to determine the status of BE.
resultsHeartburn improved in 94 (96%) of 98 and resolved in 69 patients (70%) after LARS. Regurgitation improved in 58 (84%) of 69 and dysphagia improved in 27 (82%) of 33. Distal esophageal acid exposure improved in 48 (91%) of 53 patients tested and returned to normal in 39 patients (74%). One patient underwent reoperation 2 days after fundoplication (gastric perforation). Preoperatively, biopsy revealed BE without dysplasia in 91 patients, BE indefinite for dysplasia in 12 patients, and low-grade dysplasia in 3 patients. Fifty-four of the 90 patients with endoscopic follow-up had short-segment BE (<3cm), and 36 had long-segment BE (>3cm) preoperatively. Postoperatively, endoscopy and pathology revealed complete regression of intestinal metaplasia (absence of any sign suggestive of BE) in 30 (55%) of 54 patients with short-segment BE but in 0 of 36 of those with long-segment BE. Among patients with complete regression, 89% of those tested with pH monitoring had normal esophageal acid exposure. This was observed in 69% of those who failed to have complete regression. One patient developed adenocarcinoma within 10 months of LARS.
conclusionsIn patients with BE, LARS provides excellent control of symptoms and esophageal acid exposure. Moreover, intestinal metaplasia regressed in the majority of patients who had short-segment BE and normal pH monitoring following LARS, a fact that was, heretofore, not appreciated. LARS should be recommended to patients with BE to quell symptoms and to prevent the development of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.