ArticleNucleic acids research2003
Effects of genomic context and chromatin structure on transcription-coupled and global genomic repair in mammalian cells.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Signals in Peripheral Blood: Tracking Redox Status and DNA Damage Response During the Progression of Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- DNA Damage Response and Redox Status in the Resistance of Multiple Myeloma Cells to Genotoxic Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Aging, Physical Exercise, Telomeres, and Sarcopenia: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.Archives of toxicology · 2020Review
- Defective DNA repair and chromatin organization in patients with quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus.Arthritis research & therapy · 2016Article
- Use of the comet-FISH assay to compare DNA damage and repair in p53 and hTERT genes following ionizing radiation.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has been long recognized that in mammalian cells, DNA damage is preferentially repaired in the transcribed strand of transcriptionally active genes. However, recently, we found that in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) are preferentially repaired in both the transcribed and the non-transcribed strand of exon 1 of the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene. We mapped CPD repair at the nucleotide level in the transcriptionally active DHFR gene and the adjacent upstream OST gene, both of which have been translocated to two chromosomal positions that differ from their normal endogeneous positions. This allowed us to study the role of transcription, genomic context and chromatin structure on repair. We found that CPD repair in the transcribed strand is the same for endogenous and translocated DHFR genes, and the order of repair efficiency is exon 1 > exon 2 > exon 5. However, unlike the endogenous DHFR gene, efficient repair of CPDs in the non-transcribed strand of exon 1 is not observed in the translocated DHFR gene. CPDs are efficiently repaired in the transcribed strand in endogenous and translocated OST genes, which indicates that efficient repair in exon 1 of the non-transcribed strand of the endogenous DHFR gene is not due to the extension of transcription-coupled repair of the OST gene. Using micrococcal nuclease digestion, we probed the chromatin structure in the DHFR gene and found that chromatin structure in the exon 1 region of endogenous DHFR is much more open than at translocated loci. These results suggest that while transcription-coupled repair is transcription dependent, global genomic repair is greatly affected by chromatin structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.