Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14530436›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2003

An organism-specific method to rank predicted coding regions in Trypanosoma brucei.

Shuba Gopal, George A M Cross, Terry Gaasterland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Spliced leader RNA trans-splicing in dinoflagellates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuba GopalLaboratory of Computational Genomics, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 250, New York, NY 10021, USA. shuba@genomes.rockefeller.edu
George A M Cross
Terry Gaasterland

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome annotation in differently evolved organisms presents challenges because the lack of sequence-based homology limits the ability to determine the function of putative coding regions. To provide an alternative to annotation by sequence homology, we developed a method that takes advantage of unusual trypanosomatid biology and skews in nucleotide composition between coding regions and upstream regions to rank putative open reading frames based on the likelihood of coding. The method is 93% accurate when tested on known genes. We have applied our method to the full complement of open reading frames on Chromosome I of Trypanosoma brucei, and we can predict with high confidence that 226 putative coding regions are likely to be functional. Methods such as the one described here for discriminating true coding regions are critical for genome annotation when other sources of evidence for function are limited.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceComputational BiologyDatabases, Nucleic AcidGenes, ProtozoanMolecular Sequence DataOpen Reading FramesProtozoan ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNATrypanosoma brucei bruceiProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID14530436
PMCPMC219476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.