Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14530431›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2003

Synergistic repression of anaerobic genes by Mot3 and Rox1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Odeniel Sertil, Rachna Kapoor, Brian D Cohen, Natalia Abramova, Charles V Lowry

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of eIF5A in Mitochondrial Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Outline of the biosynthesis and regulation of ergosterol in yeast.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. H3K4 methyltransferase Set1 is involved in maintenance of ergosterol homeostasis and resistance to Brefeldin A.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Odeniel SertilCenter for Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Rachna Kapoor
Brian D Cohen
Natalia Abramova
Charles V Lowry
Albany Medical Center Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two groups of anaerobic genes (genes induced in anaerobic cells and repressed in aerobic cells) are negatively regulated by heme, a metabolite present only in aerobic cells. Members of both groups, the hypoxic genes and the DAN/TIR/ERG genes, are jointly repressed under aerobic conditions by two factors. One is Rox1, an HMG protein, and the second, originally designated Rox7, is shown here to be Mot3, a global C2H2 zinc finger regulator. Repression of anaerobic genes results from co-induction of Mot3 and Rox1 in aerobic cells. Repressor synthesis is triggered by heme, which de-represses a mechanism controlling expression of both MOT3 and ROX1 in anaerobic cells; it includes Hap1, Tup1, Ssn6 and a fourth unidentified factor. The constitutive expression of various anaerobic genes in aerobic rox1Delta or mot3Delta cells directly implies that neither factor can repress by itself at endogenous levels and that stringent aerobic repression results from the concerted action of both. Mot3 and Rox1 are not essential components of a single complex, since each can repress independently in the absence of the other, when artificially induced at high levels. Moreover, the two repression mechanisms appear to be distinct: as shown here repression of ANB1 by Rox1 alone requires Tup1-Ssn6, whereas repression by Mot3 does not. Though artificially high levels of either factor can repress well, the absolute efficiency observed in normal cells when both are present-at much lower levels-demonstrates a novel inhibitory synergy. Evidently, expression levels for the two mutually dependent repressors are calibrated to permit a range of variation in basal aerobic expression at different promoters with differing operator site combinations.

Indexed as

AerobiosisAnaerobiosisDNA-Binding ProteinsDose-Response Relationship, DrugGene Expression Regulation, FungalGlycoproteinsHemeMutationNuclear ProteinsOxygenRepressor ProteinsRNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsDAN1 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsGlycoproteinsHemeMOT3 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsOxygenRepressor ProteinsRNA, FungalROX1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsTUP1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID14530431
PMCPMC219473
OpenAlexW2023135280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.