Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14528025›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2003

Developmental aspects of spinal locomotor function: insights from using the in vitro mouse spinal cord preparation.

Patrick J Whelan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Toward an Understanding of Octopus Arm Motor Control.Integrative and comparative biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Pathophysiology of Dyt1-Science translational medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bimodal Respiratory-Locomotor Neurons in the Neonatal Rat Spinal Cord.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rotational responses of vestibular-nerve afferents innervating the semicircular canals in the C57BL/6 mouse.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2008
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrick J WhelanNeuroscience Research Group and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. whelan@ucalgary.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last five years, rapid advances have been made in our understanding of the location, function, and recently, organization of the central pattern generator (CPG) for locomotion. In the mammal, the use of the neonatal rat has largely contributed to these advances. Additionally, the use of the in vitro mouse spinal cord preparation is becoming more common, catalysed in part by the potential for the use of genetic approaches to study locomotor function. Although tempting, it is necessary to resist the a priori assumption that the organization of the spinal CPG is identical in the rat and mouse. This review will describe the development of locomotor-like behaviour in the mouse from embryonic day 12 to postnatal day 14. While there are still many gaps in our knowledge, compared with the rat, the in vitro mouse appears to follow a qualitatively similar course of locomotor development. The emphasis in this review is the use or potential use of the mouse as a complement to existing data using the neonatal rat preparation.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsMammalsMiceModels, AnimalMotor ActivityNeurotransmitter AgentsRatsSpinal CordSpineNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID14528025
PMCPMC2343637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.