ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics
Comparison of stepwise and simultaneous estimations of population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TS-943.
Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction performances of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of the two methods (a stepwise and a simultaneous estimations) were evaluated with respect to their accuracies and precisions. A study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of TS-943 by a 4 hours constant infusion in 36 healthy male subjects. Population analysis was performed using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models with NONMEM. The mean of the prediction error (MPE) and the root mean squared error (RMSE) served as a measure of accuracy and precision. In addition, a bootstrap validation was also performed. The results indicate that those population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters for the two methods were comparable. The results of simultaneous estimations are similar to those obtained using a stepwise estimation. The mean parameter estimates obtained with the additional 200 bootstrap replicates of data were within 15% of those obtained with the final model in both methods. The present results demonstrated that the accuracy of pharmacodynamic evaluations using a stepwise end a simultaneous estimations was comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14527092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.