Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14526382›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2003

Therapeutic potential of venom peptides.

Richard J Lewis, Maria L Garcia

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 246 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 781 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toxins turned into medicines: A systematic review of peptide animal-derived venom in wound treatments.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard J LewisInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, Australia. r.lewis@imb.uq.edu.au
Maria L Garcia
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venomous animals have evolved a vast array of peptide toxins for prey capture and defence. These peptides are directed against a wide variety of pharmacological targets, making them an invaluable source of ligands for studying the properties of these targets in different experimental paradigms. A number of these peptides have been used in vivo for proof-of-concept studies, with several having undergone preclinical or clinical development for the treatment of pain, diabetes, multiple sclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Here we survey the pharmacology of venom peptides and assess their therapeutic prospects.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusDrug DesignHumansMolecular Sequence DataMultiple SclerosisOligopeptidesPainToxins, BiologicalVenomsOligopeptidesToxins, BiologicalVenoms

Identifiers

PMID14526382
OpenAlexW1975744071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.