Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14522942›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2003

Which end: dissecting Ku's function at telomeres and double-strand breaks.

Alison A Bertuch, Victoria Lundblad

Abstract readReviewComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Making the most of a little: dosage effects in eukaryotic telomere length maintenance.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2005
    Review
  18. Drosophila telomeres: the non-telomerase alternative.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2005
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alison A BertuchDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. abertuch@bcm.tmc.edu
Victoria Lundblad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DNA HelicasesAntigens, NuclearDimerizationDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairHumansKu AutoantigenMutationProtein ConformationTelomereYeastsAntigens, NuclearDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesKu AutoantigenXRCC5 protein, humanXrcc6 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID14522942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.