Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14516069›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2003

Reconstruction of the ancestral karyotype of eutherian mammals.

F Richard, M Lombard, B Dutrillaux

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Karyotype diversity suggests that Laonastes aenigmamus (Laotian rock rat) (Rodentia, Diatomyidae) is a multi-specific genus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. High-resolution chromosome painting reveals the first genetic signature for the chiropteran suborder Pteropodiformes (Mammalia: Chiroptera).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  9. Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  10. Divergent patterns of breakpoint reuse in Muroid rodents.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phylogenomics of African guenons.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Tracking genome organization in rodents by Zoo-FISH.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  17. Defining the ancestral eutherian karyotype: a cladistic interpretation of chromosome painting and genome sequence assembly data.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  18. Chromosome homology between mouse and three Muridae species, Millardia meltada, Acomys dimidiatus and Micromys minutus, and conserved chromosome segments in murid karyotypes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F RichardUMR 147 CNRS, Institut Curie, Section Recherche, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France. florence.richard@curie.fr
M Lombard
B Dutrillaux
CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Fontenay-aux-roses · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Curie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Applying the parsimony principle, i.e. that chromosomes identical in species belonging to different taxa were likely to be present in their common ancestor, the ancestral karyotype of eutherian mammals (about 100 million years old) was tentatively reconstructed. Comparing chromosome banding with all ZOO-FISH data from literature or studied by us, this reconstruction can be proposed with only limited uncertainties. This karyotype comprised 50 chromosomes of which 40-42 were acrocentrics. Ten ancestral pairs of chromosomes were homologous to a single human chromosome: 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 17, 18, 20, X and Y (human nomenclature). Nine others were homologous to a part of a human chromosome: 1p + q (proximal), 1q, 2p + q (proximal), 2q, part of 7, 8q, 10p, 10q and 19p (human nomenclature). Finally, seven pairs of chromosomes, homologs to human chromosomes 3 + 21, 4 + 8p, part of 7 + 16p, part of 12 + part of 22 (twice), 14 + 15, 16q + 19q, formed syntenies disrupted in man.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsChromosome BandingChromosome PaintingChromosomesHumansKaryotypingMammals

Identifiers

PMID14516069
OpenAlexW173134439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.