Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14514947›Full record

ReviewThorax2003

Lung cancer. 9: Molecular biology of lung cancer: clinical implications.

K M Fong, Y Sekido, A F Gazdar, J D Minna

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thorax, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Polyphenolic compounds from KoreanOncology letters · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Ribonucleotide reductase and non-small cell lung cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2012
    Review
  14. [Advances of DNA methylation in early diagnosis of lung cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K M FongThe Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane 4032, Australia.
Y Sekido
A F Gazdar
J D Minna
Prince Charles Hospital · AU

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS--SPORE IN LUNG CANCERP50CA070907 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GIBBONS, DON LYNN · 1996 to 2024
$57.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA70907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been hypothesised that clinically evident lung cancers have accumulated many different genetic or epigenetic abnormalities in oncogenes and/or tumour suppressor genes. This notion has important clinical ramifications. Recent developments in our knowledge of the molecular biology of lung cancer are reviewed, with particular reference to genetic abnormalities in tumour suppressor gene inactivation and overactivity of growth promoting oncogenes. These changes lead to the "hallmarks of lung cancer". These hallmarks are the new rational targets for early detection, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer.

Indexed as

ApoptosisDNA MethylationGenes, Tumor SuppressorGrowth SubstancesHumansLung NeoplasmsMolecular BiologyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisNeovascularization, PathologicProto-OncogenesTelomeraseGrowth SubstancesTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID14514947
PMCPMC1746489
OpenAlexW2115210097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.