ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2003
Superiority of combined chemo-embolization and portal infusion with 5-fluorouracil over locoregional infusion concepts in Novikoff hepatoma-bearing rats.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination treatment of CC531-lac-Z rat liver metastases by chemoembolization with pemetrexed disodium and gemcitabine.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2005Article
- Chemoembolization of rat liver metastasis with irinotecan and quantification of tumor cell reduction.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate experimentally whether there is a superior effect of the combination of hepatic artery chemo-embolization with portal vein infusion over either of the two treatment modalities alone. Novikoff hepatoma cells transplanted under the liver capsule of Sprague Dawley rats were used as a model. Tumor growth was assessed at 7 and 21 days after tumor inoculation. The prolamine solution Ethibloc was employed for embolization, and 5-fluorouracil was used as a chemotherapeutic agent for both infusion and chemo-embolization. All arterial treatment modalities were administered in a super-selective manner. There was no intolerable toxicity after dosages of 55 to 125 mg 5-fluorouracil/kg body weight. With regard to therapeutic efficacy the results show that embolization is an effective therapeutic means for inducing tumor necrosis in selected liver areas. As a consequence, the ranking of all treatment modalities was based on the combined evaluation of tumor size and extent of tumor necrosis. According to this evaluation, hepatic artery chemo-embolization was superior to the respective type of infusion (P<0.01). In addition, the combination of both modalities in the form of hepatic artery chemo-embolization and portal vein infusion was effective in destroying more than 97% of vital tumor tissue (P<0.01). These results suggest the need for a comparative clinical study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.