Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14512449›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

The role of risk communication in shared decision making.

William Godolphin

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Risk calculators-methods, development, implementation, and validation.International journal of colorectal disease · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Incorporating the patient perspective: a critical review of clinical practice guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2013
    Review
  11. Prescribing and partnership with patients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
  13. "I Found it on the Internet": Preparing for the e-patient in Oman.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2010
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical risk management of herb-drug interactions.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007
    Review
  17. Putting informed and shared decision making into practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2006
    Article
  18. Asthma adherence and the athlete.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2005
    Review
  19. Communicating risk: but does it work, Doctor?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
    Article
  20. Communicating risk: we as doctors are not alone.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William Godolphin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient ParticipationRisk AssessmentHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsProfessional Patient Relationship

Identifiers

PMID14512449
PMCPMC200791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.