Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14508604›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2003

Controlling transcription by destruction: the regulation of yeast Gcn4p stability.

Stefan Irniger, Gerhard H Braus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan IrnigerInstitute of Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August-University, Grisebachstrasse 8, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Gerhard H Braus
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Gcn4 protein, a member of the AP-1 family of transcription factors, is involved in the expression of more than 500 genes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A key role of Gcn4p is the increased expression of many amino acid biosynthesis genes in response to amino acid starvation. The accumulation of this transcription activator is mainly induced by efficient translation of the GCN4 ORF and by stabilisation of the Gcn4 protein. Under normal growth conditions, Gcn4p is a highly unstable protein, thereby resembling many eukaryotic transcription factors, including mammalian Jun and Myc proteins. Gcn4p is degraded by ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis mediated by the Skp1/cullin/F-box (SCF) ubiquitin ligase, which recognises specifically phosphorylated substrates. Two cyclin-dependent protein kinases, Pho85p and Srb10p, have crucial functions in regulating Gcn4p phosphorylation and degradation. The past few years have revealed many novel insights into these regulatory processes. Here, we summarise current knowledge about the factors and mechanisms regulating Gcn4p stability.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticCyclin-Dependent KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalPhosphorylationProtein KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSKP Cullin F-Box Protein LigasesCyclin-Dependent KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsPHO85 protein, S cerevisiaeProtein KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSKP Cullin F-Box Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID14508604
OpenAlexW2033456186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.