Trial reportThe British journal of ophthalmology2003
Efficacy and safety of ketotifen eye drops in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Trial report in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topical antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers for treating seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Comparison of olopatadine with ketotifen for allergic conjunctivitis: a meta-analysis study.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2023Article
- Topical ketotifen treatment for allergic conjunctivitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Targets in Allergic Conjunctivitis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Topical Ketotifen Fumarate Inhibits Choroidal Mast Cell Degranulation and Loss of Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells in Rat Model for Geographic Atrophy.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- A role for mast cells in geographic atrophy.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020Article
- A contemporary look at allergic conjunctivitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020Review
- Article
- Multiple endpoint analysis of BAC-preserved and unpreserved antiallergic eye drops on a 3D-reconstituted corneal epithelial model.Molecular vision · 2011Article
- Roles of histamine and its receptors in allergic and inflammatory bowel diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2005Review
- [Ocular allergies].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2005Review
- Topical Olopatadine Hydrochloride versus Ketotifen Fumarate for Allergic Conjunctivitis.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKetotifen blocks histamine H(1) receptors, stabilises mast cells, and prevents eosinophil accumulation. These multiple, pharmacological mechanisms provided the rationale for assessing the efficacy and safety of ketotifen 0.025% eye drops in subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) in an environmental setting.
methodsThis was a double masked, randomised, multicentre trial conducted in Australia. Subjects were randomly assigned to ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution, placebo (as vehicle), or levocabastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic suspension, twice daily in each eye for a 4 week period. Subjects were assessed at follow up (days 5-8) and termination (days 25-31) visits. The primary efficacy variable was the responder rate, based on the subjects' assessment of global efficacy at the follow up visit.
results519 subjects were randomised to treatment. At the follow up visit, the responder rate, based on subjects' assessment of global efficacy, was significantly greater in the ketotifen group (49.5%) than in the placebo group (33.0%) for subjects with a positive diagnostic test for pollen allergy (p = 0.02). The investigators' assessment of responder rates also showed that ketotifen was superior to placebo (p = 0.001). Ketotifen produced a significantly better outcome than levocabastine (p<0.05) for relief of signs and symptoms of SAC, at both the follow up and the termination visit. The type and frequency of adverse events were similar across treatment groups.
conclusionsIn an environmental setting, ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution was well tolerated and effective in reducing the signs and symptoms of SAC, and in preventing their recurrence. Ketotifen consistently showed the best efficacy in comparison with both placebo and levocabastine. These results indicate that ketotifen eye drops are a valuable treatment option for this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.