ReviewThe Clinical investigator1992
Renal long-term effects of calcium antagonist treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Review in The Clinical investigator, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemoprophylaxis of diabetic nephropathy in the elderly.Drugs & aging · 1996Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although calcium antagonists have long been introduced into antihypertensive treatment, little is known of their renal long-term action in patients with diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy, or hypertension. Much of the current information concerning this issue is from short-term studies. While urinary albumin excretion, a major indicator of glomerular damage in patients with diabetes mellitus, remains unchanged or even increases during short-term calcium antagonist treatment in type 1 diabetic patients, it is mostly reduced in type 2 diabetic patients, especially by diltiazem and nicardipine. There have been discrepant observations in studies lasting 6-months or longer. In many of the studies, urinary albumin excretion is not decreased by calcium antagonist treatment, although blood pressure is well controlled. Albuminuria is markedly reduced, however, after nitrendipine or diltiazem treatment. While calcium antagonists such as diltiazem, nicardipine, or nitrendipine may be as efficacious as converting enzyme inhibitors in preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease in diabetic patients, the beneficial efficacy of others is less apparent. Reduced albuminuria may be more difficult to attain in macroalbuminuric patients with advanced nephropathy. However, considerations on the potential effects of calcium antagonist long-term treatment on cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in diabetic patients should not be overlooked when their renal action is under discussion. Thus, further studies are needed to define the role of calcium antagonists more precisely in the long-term treatment of diabetic patients with hypertension or diabetic nephropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.