Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14506028›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003

High-dose azithromycin versus high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for treatment of children with recurrent or persistent acute otitis media.

Antonio Arrieta, Adriano Arguedas, Pilar Fernandez, Stan L Block, Paz Emperanza, Sergio L Vargas, William A Erhardt, Pascal J de Caprariis, Constance D Rothermel

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Short-course antibiotics for acute otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Searching for the Holy Grail of acute otitis media.Archives of disease in childhood · 2006
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reported rates of diarrhea following oral penicillin therapy in pediatric clinical trials.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio ArrietaChildren's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California, USA.
Adriano Arguedas
Pilar Fernandez
Stan L Block
Paz Emperanza
Sergio L Vargas
William A Erhardt
Pascal J de Caprariis
Constance D Rothermel
Pfizer (United States) · USChildren's Hospital of Orange County · USHospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile · CLOhio Pediatric Research Association · USUniversity of Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants and young children, especially those in day care, are at risk for recurrent or persistent acute otitis media (AOM). There are no data on oral alternatives to high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for treating AOM in these high-risk patients. In this double-blind, double-dummy multicenter clinical trial, we compared a novel, high-dose azithromycin regimen with high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for treatment of children with recurrent or persistent AOM. Three hundred four children were randomized; 300 received either high-dose azithromycin (20 mg/kg of body weight once a day for 3 days) or high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate (90 mg/kg divided twice a day for 10 days). Tympanocentesis was performed at baseline; clinical response was assessed at day 12 to 16 and day 28 to 32. Two-thirds of patients were aged < or =2 years. A history of recurrent, persistent, or recurrent plus persistent AOM was noted in 67, 18, and 14% of patients, respectively. Pathogens were isolated from 163 of 296 intent-to-treat patients (55%). At day 12 to 16, clinical success rates for azithromycin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were comparable for all patients (86 versus 84%, respectively) and for children aged < or =2 years (85 versus 79%, respectively). At day 28 to 32, clinical success rates for azithromycin were superior to those for amoxicillin-clavulanate for all patients (72 versus 61%, respectively; P = 0.047) and for those aged < or =2 years (68 versus 51%, respectively; P = 0.017). Per-pathogen clinical efficacy against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae was comparable between the two regimens. The rates of treatment-related adverse events for azithromycin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were 32 and 42%, respectively (P = 0.095). Corresponding compliance rates were 99 and 93%, respectively (P = 0.018). These data demonstrate the efficacy and safety of high-dose azithromycin for treating recurrent or persistent AOM.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansInfantMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOtitis MediaPatient CompliancePenicillinsAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinPenicillins

Identifiers

PMID14506028
PMCPMC201139
OpenAlexW2100970056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.