Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14505034›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2003

Entropy-based SNP selection for genetic association studies.

Jochen Hampe, Stefan Schreiber, Michael Krawczak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficient genome-wide TagSNP selection across populations via the linkage disequilibrium criterion.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Prioritize and select SNPs for association studies with multi-stage designs.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An entropy-based statistic for genomewide association studies.American journal of human genetics · 2005
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jochen HampeKlinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Schittenhelmstrasse 12, 24105 Kiel, Germany. J.Hampe@mucosa.de
Stefan Schreiber
Michael Krawczak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of their abundance, density, and ease of practical use, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have become the major source of information for association gene mapping in humans. Sensible strategies for selecting practically useful SNPs are therefore required. Among the factors influencing the mapping utility of a given set of SNPs are (1). their individual diversity, (2). their haplotype structure in the population of interest, and (3). their physical distribution. We propose a strategy integrating these aspects into a single mapping utility measure, which is based upon Shannon entropy, and which maximizes the amount of information extracted from a genomic region under a Malecot model of linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay. The same utility measure has also been used to define a criterion guiding SNP discovery and rational decision-making about the continuation or termination of a mapping study. The proposed strategy performs consistently well in a data set comprising 549 German control individuals, genotyped for 136 SNPs from four genomic regions of different LD structure. Adoption of the method in practice is estimated to save up to 30% of genotyping load when compared with equidistant SNP localization or pair-wise LD minimization alone.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanDNAEntropyGenetic VariationHumansModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.