Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14504363›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2003

Time To Pregnancy and occupational lead exposure.

M Joffe, L Bisanti, P Apostoli, P Kiss, A Dale, N Roeleveld, M-L Lindbohm, M Sallmén, M Vanhoorne, J P Bonde and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Determinants of Erythrocyte Lead Levels in 454 Adults in Florence, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. How does lead induce male infertility?Iranian journal of reproductive medicine · 2011
    Review
  5. Paternal work stress and prolonged time to pregnancy.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2009
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decreased fecundity among male lead workers.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

M JoffeImperial College Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK. m.joffe@imperial.ac.uk
L Bisanti
P Apostoli
P Kiss
A Dale
N Roeleveld
M-L Lindbohm
M Sallmén
M Vanhoorne
J P Bonde
Asclepios
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIGhent University · BEAarhus University · DKPublic Health England · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLead exposure is known to be harmful to the male reproductive system, including impairment of fertility. However, it is unclear whether currently existing low levels of exposure have this effect.

aimsTo study retrospectively current workers in lead using industries (battery manufacture, smelting, etc), and in non-lead using control industries, in four European countries, with Time To Pregnancy as the outcome variable, as part of the EU funded Asclepios Project.

methodsExposure assessment was mainly by blood lead values, which were available from the late 1970s, supplemented by imputed values where necessary. Three exposure models were studied: (1) short term (recent) exposure; (2) total duration of work in a lead using industry; and (3) cumulative exposure. A Cox proportional hazards model with discrete ties was used for the statistical analysis, with covariates for both partners.

resultsA total of 1104 subjects took part, of whom 638 were occupationally exposed to lead at the relevant time. Blood lead levels were mainly less than 50 microg/dl. No consistent association of Time To Pregnancy with lead exposure was found in any of the exposure models, although reduced fertility was observed in one category each in models (2) and (3).

conclusionsThis basically negative result is unlikely to be due to the misclassification of key variables, to insufficient statistical power, or to bias, for example, response bias. If any impairment of male reproductive function exists at the levels of occupational lead exposure now current, it does not appear to reduce biological fertility.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfertility, MaleLeadMaleOccupational ExposurePaternal ExposurePregnancyProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsLead

Identifiers

PMID14504363
PMCPMC1740393
OpenAlexW1980194206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.