Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14500893›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2003

Beta edge strands in protein structure prediction and aggregation.

Jennifer A Siepen, Sheena E Radford, David R Westhead

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The energetic basis for hydroxyapatite mineralization by amelogenin variants provides insights into the origin ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. β-Bulges: extensive structural analyses of β-sheets irregularities.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A method to predict edge strands in beta-sheets from protein sequences.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer A SiepenSchool of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Sheena E Radford
David R Westhead

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council SF16972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that recognition between exposed edges of beta-sheets is an important mode of protein-protein interaction and can have pathological consequences; for instance, it has been linked to the aggregation of proteins into a fibrillar structure, which is associated with a number of predominantly neurodegenerative disorders. A number of protective mechanisms have evolved in the edge strands of beta-sheets, preventing the aggregation and insolubility of most natural beta-sheet proteins. Such mechanisms are unfavorable in the interior of a beta-sheet. The problem of distinguishing edge strands from central strands based on sequence information alone is important in predicting residues and mutations likely to be involved in aggregation, and is also a first step in predicting folding topology. Here we report support vector machine (SVM) and decision tree methods developed to classify edge strands from central strands in a representative set of protein domains. Interestingly, rules generated by the decision tree method are in close agreement with our knowledge of protein structure and are potentially useful in a number of different biological applications. When trained on strands from proteins of known structure, using structure-based (Dictionary of Secondary Structure in Proteins) strand assignments, both methods achieved mean cross-validated, prediction accuracies of approximately 78%. These accuracies were reduced when strand assignments from secondary structure prediction were used. Further investigation of this effect revealed that it could be explained by a significant reduction in the accuracy of standard secondary structure prediction methods for edge strands, in comparison with central strands.

Indexed as

Protein Structure, SecondaryAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceArtificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinDecision TreesHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMathematical ComputingModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSolubilityProteins

Identifiers

PMID14500893
PMCPMC2366916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.